[Dev] FW: some issues in the process of TCT Bluetooth testing

corentin.lecouvey at open.eurogiciel.org corentin.lecouvey at open.eurogiciel.org
Tue Aug 12 09:15:45 GMT 2014


Hi Zheng Wu,

Thanks for your feedback on bluetooth classes. I will fix that asap.

Btw, I'm not able to make rfcomm socket work. Is this feature available 
or not ?

Best regards,
Corentin


On 08/12/2014 10:19 AM, Zheng, Wu wrote:
> Hi corentin,
>
> Please check the cases of BluetoothDevice_isConnected_attribute :139 line and BluetoothDevice_uuid_attribute +163 line.
>
> The issues are the same with BluetoothClass.
>
> Please fix them. Thanks.
>
> Best Regards
> Zheng Wu
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zheng, Wu
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:25 PM
>> To: 'corentin.lecouvey at open.eurogiciel.org'
>> Cc: 'dev at lists.tizen.org'; Xu, Martin; Jia, Pei P; Le Foll, Dominique
>> Subject: some issues in the process of TCT Bluetooth testing
>>
>> Hi Corentin,
>>
>> Do you come back for Bluetooth tasks today? Welcome back.
>>
>> We still are testing Bluetooth TCT testing.
>>
>> We are using
>> https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=platform/framework/web/tizen-extensions-
>> crosswalk.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/sandbox/clecouve/tizen to test.
>>
>> Some issues are related with tizen-extensions-crosswalk and please check
>> them.
>>
>> 1. BluetoothManager_deviceMajor_attribute
>> 2. BluetoothManager_deviceMinor_attribute
>> 3. BluetoothManager_deviceService_attribute
>>
>> Bluetooth CAPIs are not used in the three test cases. Therefore, please
>> check the related source code of tizen-extensions-crosswalk.
>>
>> 4.in the case of BluetoothClass.
>>
>> It failed in 104 and 105 line:
>>
>> 101:devService = device.deviceClass.services[0];
>> 102:device.deviceClass.services[0] = null; 103:device.deviceClass.services
>> = [];
>>
>> 104:assert_type(device.deviceClass.services[0], "unsigned short",
>> "device.deviceClass.services[0] is type number.");
>> 105:assert_true(devService === device.deviceClass.services[0],
>> "device.deviceClass.services[0] readonly");
>>
>> 104 line : It means that device.deviceClass.services[0] is not "unsigned
>> short" and in fact,  the type of device.deviceClass.services[0] is object.
>> 105 line: It means that device.deviceClass.services[0] should be readonly
>> and 102 and 103 line can't modify the value of
>> device.deviceClass.services[0].
>>
>> However, it can be modified.
>>
>> Can you check the related source codes of tizen-extensions-crosswal and
>> fix them?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Zheng Wu



More information about the Dev mailing list