[Dev] Issues on converting from vconf to buxton
sm79.lee at samsung.com
Fri Aug 22 10:16:15 GMT 2014
Thanks for guide about buxton.
However, I worry about that developers should register the fd of buxton to the main loop of a program.
Most programs in Tizen use g_main_loop as its main loop, so, it may be very useful if there is a simple api for registering buxton fd to the g_main_loop.
What do you think about it?
From: Peters, Brad T [mailto:brad.t.peters at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 6:12 AM
To: Semun Lee
Cc: Tizen Dev
Subject: Re: [Dev] Issues on converting from vconf to buxton
What is Buxton and how can I use it?
Should it replace our use of vconf?
I have uploaded "A Brief Guide to Buxton" to the public Tizen wiki, which
should answer these questions, and more.
Note there is also a Wiki page for Buxton, which provides a high-level overview of Buxton.
We'll be providing a sample conversion of the FLIGHT_MODE vconf key, as used in a Tizen 2.2 RD PQ image.
Though I would have loved to provide these sample conversions in a 3.0 environment, the only 3.0 Tizen image
I have access to is IVI, which does not use vconf. Thus, not a particularly good demonstration project ;)
Please use the resources provided, and let me know if there are questions.
Intel Tizen Mobile Development Lead
and AppFW Architect
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Peters, Brad T <brad.t.peters at intel.com> wrote:
This is a valid point and a good idea. We're currently working to put together several demonstration projects which have been fully converted. A guide like you suggest would go well with these. I'll start putting such a document together, and have something out towards end of week.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Semun Lee <sm79.lee at samsung.com> wrote:
There are hundreds jira issues about converting from vconf to buxton.
Is there any guide in detail for this issue?
I think we need a guide to convert from vconf to buxton coherently.
Dev mailing list
Dev at lists.tizen.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dev