[Dev] State of Pending changes , how to enhance workflow ? ( Was Dear Maintainers )

Łukasz Stelmach l.stelmach at samsung.com
Mon Feb 3 12:44:53 GMT 2014


It was <2014-01-31 pią 19:39>, when Schaufler, Casey wrote:
> Another alternative is that we require a Reviewed-by: line just like
> we require a Signed-off-by: and a Change-id: when a change is
> submitted. The dedicated reviewers could decide if that was good
> enough and would have some assurance that the change had been run past
> someone. Of course, “Reviewed-by:” can’t be the submitter.

This is technically impossible and pointless with Gerrit. +1s and +2s
(ticks) do mean exactly the same as Reviewed-by without creating a new
commit (that is required to change commit message).

-- 
Łukasz Stelmach
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140203/b29772bb/attachment.sig>


More information about the Dev mailing list