[Dev] State of Pending changes , how to enhance workflow ? ( Was Dear Maintainers )
casey.schaufler at intel.com
Mon Feb 3 15:58:43 GMT 2014
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Łukasz Stelmach [mailto:l.stelmach at samsung.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 4:45 AM
> To: Schaufler, Casey
> Cc: Hanchett, Paul; Philippe Coval; dev at lists.tizen.org
> Subject: Re: [Dev] State of Pending changes , how to enhance workflow ? (
> Was Dear Maintainers )
> It was <2014-01-31 pią 19:39>, when Schaufler, Casey wrote:
> > Another alternative is that we require a Reviewed-by: line just like
> > we require a Signed-off-by: and a Change-id: when a change is
> > submitted. The dedicated reviewers could decide if that was good
> > enough and would have some assurance that the change had been run
> > someone. Of course, “Reviewed-by:” can’t be the submitter.
> This is technically impossible and pointless with Gerrit. +1s and +2s
> (ticks) do mean exactly the same as Reviewed-by without creating a new
> commit (that is required to change commit message).
I'm sorry, I wasn't clear.
Before the submit to gerrit the developer gets the code reviewed.
The initial submit to gerrit includes the "Reviewed-by:" line.
What I'm trying to say here is that the review is done first,
then the submit. That way you don't get hung up waiting for a
The problem we are seeing is that reviews are not getting done.
Put the burden of getting a review on the developer.
> Łukasz Stelmach
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
More information about the Dev