[Dev] GDBUS implementation using KDBUS - Any news on this ?
frederik.lotter at mixtelematics.com
Fri Oct 3 08:27:29 GMT 2014
On 3 October 2014 09:54, Lukasz Skalski <l.skalski at samsung.com> wrote:
> On 10/03/2014 09:37 AM, Frederik Lotter wrote:
>> Hi All,
> I saw some work was done testing an initial implementation of GDBUS on
>> top of KDBUS.
>> This was end of last year that I saw some patches appearing on the
>> mailing list.
>> Can anyone give me an idea of whether any further work or testing was
>> done on this? We are planning to use the GDBUS binding for DBUS in our
>> firmware, but I am hoping that the faster KDBUS implementation would be
>> available by the end of 2015 so we can release a product using the
>> faster implementation, and allow us to use the same interface for more
>> data intensive application when future functionality needs to be added.
>> Any comments would be appreciated.
> Here you can find all information on the current 'kdbus support in GLib'
Thank you do much for your quick reply and the bug reference.
I would like to ask one high level question please. I am currently using
GDBus and GDBus-codegen in our IPC framework. Once we switch to a kdbus
capable GDBus implementation, how much would I have to change in the
application GDBus code (using the DBUS system bus for process communication
between our own application processes)? From what I can gather reading
through the bug description, it feels like standard GDBus-codegen code
should still work transparently ... this is what I am hoping for.
> Kind Regards,
>> Frederik Lotter
>> Firmware Engineer,
>> Mix Telematics
>> South Africa
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at lists.tizen.org
> Lukasz Skalski
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
> l.skalski at samsung.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dev