[Dev] Integration of state management in Weston Wayland.

Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) dominig.arfoll at fridu.net
Tue Oct 7 13:51:08 GMT 2014


system Apps may have the same issue than Crosswalk, this is why my 
proposition requires to check that the requesting App has the privilege 
of AppID Proxy.

In detailed an App is identified by the couple (Smack label, user ID) so 
the dialer may be a slightly different case because the surface shown 
would be actually own by the dailer and not the application requesting 
the call and so the Murpjy policy might be defined against the dialer 
rather than the App requesting the call.

But you are correct in the fact that the general issue remains open.

Dominig ar Foll
Senior Software Architect
Open Source Technology Centre
Intel SSG

Le 07/10/2014 15:11, Patrick Ohly a écrit :
> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 14:33 +0200, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote:
>> For native App the model is quite simple in the sense that the App
>> requesting the surface to Weston/Wayland is identifiable by it's AppID
>> (which equals its Smack label).
> What about trusted system apps currently running with the same "user"
> Smack label (for example, the Lemolo dialer)? Will that be possible
> going forward, and how will they be treated by Murphy and/or the app
> framework?

More information about the Dev mailing list