[Dev] Path of installed applications

MECHIN Bruno bruno.mechin at open.eurogiciel.org
Tue Oct 14 09:35:31 GMT 2014


Tomasz,
Thansk for your feedback .
When are you be able to provide an accurate schedule. On our side we are 
dependant to your delivery, please consider that we need at least one 
month for integration part.

Best regards, Cordialement
Bruno MECHIN
Tizen Vannes

Le 14/10/2014 11:01, Tomasz Swierczek a écrit :
>
> Hi Mechin Bruno,
>
> With Rafal (Security-Manager) and Lukasz Wojciechowski  (working on 
> Cynara) we’ve just come up with task list, we’re working on schedule 
> and we’d like to share it, of course. Making Crosswalk run with 
> security integration to allow per-user/global app installation and 
> launch is our goal for Common release in December.
>
> BRs,
>
> cid:44YDXKW4QKNM at namo.co.kr
>
> Tomasz Świerczek
>
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>
> Samsung Electronics
>
> Office +48 22 377 95 59
>
> Cell +48 503 135 021
>
> t.swierczek at samsung.com <mailto:t.swierczek at samsung.com>
>
> *From:*Dev [mailto:dev-bounces at lists.tizen.org] *On Behalf Of *MECHIN 
> Bruno
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:58 AM
> *To:* dev at lists.tizen.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Dev] Path of installed applications
>
> Hi All,
>
> As we have an agreement, It will be very useful to provide schedule to 
> implementing, integrating and validating these feature.
> So,  José, Rafal, would you mind providing us such schedule ?
>
>
> Best regards, Cordialement
> *Bruno MECHIN
> *Tizen project
>
> Le 13/10/2014 18:50, Rafał Krypa a écrit :
>
>     On 2014-10-09 14:23, José Bollo wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>
>           
>
>         During recent F2F of the security team, we had long discussion about the
>
>         packages that have more than one application.
>
>           
>
>         There are some more decisions to finalize this behaviour. One of this
>
>         decision is to define the directory layout of the installation. There
>
>         are several choices.
>
>           
>
>         Suppose a package whose id is PKG that have two applications whose ids
>
>         inside the package are APP1 and APP2. The global ids of these two
>
>         applications are GAPP1 and GPP2, they are computed on the base of the
>
>         pairs (PKG, APP1) and (PKG, APP2), for example: PKG.APP1 or PKG:APP1.
>
>           
>
>         When installing the package into the directory APPSDIR, what structure
>
>         will be chosen?
>
>           
>
>         1) APPSDIR/PGK/APP1 and APPSDIR/PGK/APP2
>
>         or
>
>         2) APPSDIR/GAPP1 and APPSDIR/GAPP2
>
>           
>
>         IIRC, the choice (2) was pointed out during F2F, but I'm not sure that
>
>         it was really discussed. Do you confirm? What would be best?
>
>       
>
>     Hi,
>
>     The final proposal was based on the choice [1]. The separate directory level for pkgId is necessary for file exchange between applications inside the package.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Dev mailing list
>
>     Dev at lists.tizen.org  <mailto:Dev at lists.tizen.org>
>
>     https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20141014/88aba127/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 2228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20141014/88aba127/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Dev mailing list