[Dev] Enhancing development workflow
patrick.ohly at intel.com
Wed Oct 29 12:46:11 GMT 2014
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 11:39 +0000, Bartosh, Eduard wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Ohly [mailto:patrick.ohly at intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:20 AM
> To: Bartosh, Eduard
> Cc: Stephane Desneux; Lehtonen, Markus; dev at lists.tizen.org
> Subject: Re: [Dev] Enhancing development workflow
> On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 17:05 +0000, Bartosh, Eduard wrote:
> > > So you're describing another type of submissions, which should be
> > handled by the users themselves: it'd be the same mechanisme as
> > sandboxes in gerrit, but for builds. And when you're here, you're not
> > far from using home projects in OBS, which is not what we want.
> > Yeah, it would be good to isolate this types of submissions in another
> > namespace (home:devel: or something like that). However, I don't agree
> > that prerelease projects can't be used for this purpose right away.
> > The only thing which needs to be done is to agree with RE that they
> > don't touch submission until devs say it's ok to integrate it. Not a
> > big deal from my point of view.
> > I disagree about this being not a big deal. This relies on
> out-of-band, unrecorded communication between people, which is
> error-prone. What if one RE knows not to accept, but some other RE
> doesn't and accidentally accepts?
> What if developer will ask both REs?
This helps of course, but doesn't address the underlying problem. It's
easy for you and me, but most developers don't even know who's currently
the active RE(s).
> Let me make it clear - I'm not saying this is a perfect scheme. I'm
> saying that this is working scheme and can be used right away. I'm as
> RE don't see this as a big deal. If developer asks me not to touch
> something until it's ready - I'm ok with this. To make this kind of
> projects easily recognizable we can use predefined submit tags for
> them. The benefits of this approach is: RE will see those projects can
> ping developers if they forget about them. Developers can get package
> repositories, images and even test results for their submissions. All
> of it is available for usage right now!
Using special tags would be better. Is it already possible? I think I
ran into some kind of name format check when I tried to use a normal
string as tag once.
> > Tagging different "gbs submit"s with the same tag has a similar problem:
> > while the developer is in the process of adding submits, the group
> submission is incomplete and must not be accepted. If for some reason
> the developer gets interrupted, the group submission is left in an
> incomplete state and might get accepted accidentally (assuming that it
> Unless developer contacts RE and asks not to accept this particular
> submission. Simple like that.
Same problem (dependency on out-of-band communication). It works, but I
wouldn't call that a robust process.
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
More information about the Dev