[Dev] Misalignment of Tizen profiles on Tizen:Common

Mats Wichmann mats at osg.samsung.com
Wed May 20 00:07:09 GMT 2015

On 05/19/15 15:34, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2015 12:49:51 +0200 Tomasz Swierczek <t.swierczek at samsung.com>
> said:
>> Apart from being a common part of all profiles, this *really is* the base for
>> work of Tizen security team.
>> Without Common we will have a big problem in keeping all our work properly
>> tested & released - and we may quickly end up with 3 separate "Tizen's" on
>> each profile.
>> Like Stephane wrote, Common's status *needs to be clarified*. Unfortunately,
>> I'm  not the person with authority to do this. 
> the status is the same. the problem is - people don't really care. they are
> tasked to work on tizen tv or tizen mobile, so that's what they work on.
> everything else is irrelevant. they are not interested in common or any other
> profile. it's the reality.
> our core problem is that we HAVE PROFILES (as in separate tizen stacks). this
> should cease imho. there should be just "tizen". a tizen MOBILE device may
> add/include some extra daemons or packages (or remove some). same for tv or ivi
> etc. etc. - a profile should be nothing more than a list of guaranteed minimum
> libraries, services and "ui style".

so we don't have a chance of having maintainers reject patches because
"this belongs in Common"?

More information about the Dev mailing list