[Dev] Tizen Common is back
leon.anavi at konsulko.com
Thu Nov 19 12:19:26 GMT 2015
On 18.11.2015 14:58, Pawel Sikorski wrote:
> I would like to add few additional comments in the area of crosswalk and
> We are considering Crosswalk-tizen as the crosswalk port for tizen. It is
> based upon chromium-efl that is included in tizen image. However, the
> coupling/dependency between the crosswalk-tizen and chromium-efl is removed
> - crosswalk-tizen is based upon webview abstraction layer (ewk API) exposed
> by chromium-efl.
> Thanks to such decoupling, crosswalk-tizen and web engine can be
> changed/updated separately.
> In opposite, "old" crosswalk was tightly coupled and deployed together with
> chromium engine, which wasn't ported for efl.
Thank you very much for the provided valuable information.
Are the existing Tizen specific extension for the "old" crosswalk
compatible with crosswalk-tizen and chromuim-efl?
> Best Regards,
> Pawel Sikorski
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dev [mailto:dev-bounces at lists.tizen.org] On Behalf Of Maciej Wereski
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:15 PM
> To: Leon Anavi
> Cc: dev at lists.tizen.org
> Subject: Re: [Dev] Tizen Common is back
> Dnia wtorek, 17 listopada 2015 15:47:33 Leon Anavi pisze:
>> Hi Maciej,
>> Well done! Thank you for sharing the news :)
>> On 17.11.2015 15:29, Maciej Wereski wrote:
>>> Next big step is crosswalk to crosswalk-tizen
>> Could you please provide more details about this transitions? What are
>> the differences between Crosswalk and Crosswalk-tizen?
> Some time ago wrt was replaced with crosswalk-tizen on TV and Mobile
> (see TINF-1074). As I've said, we're aligning now with other profiles and
> crosswalk isn't used on any active profiles. That's our motivation.
> More details about differences will be provided by colleague from Web Team.
>> Best regards,
More information about the Dev