[Dev] Tizen Common is back
p.sikorski at samsung.com
Wed Nov 25 09:38:36 GMT 2015
>> Will crosswalk-tizen still support remote debugging using the option
>> "--remote-debugging-port=9222" ?
To be able to launch crosswalk-tizen into the debug mode, you need to you
platform launcher with "-d" option:
sh-4.3# app_launcher --help
Usage : app_launcher [ OPTIONS... ] [ ARGS... ]
-h --help Display this usage
-l --list Display installed apps list
-S --status Display running apps list
-s [tizen application ID] --start Launch widget with tizen
-k [tizen application ID] --kill Kill widget with tizen
-t [tizen application ID] --terminate Terminate widget with
tizen application ID
-r [tizen application ID] --is-running Check whether application
is running by tizen application ID,
If widget is running,
0(zero) will be returned.
-d --debug Activate debug mode
However, it is impossible to point the port number on which the debug will
be available. Port, on which debug is opened will be pointed on the console
output (after launching app via app_launcher).
From: Leon Anavi [mailto:leon.anavi at konsulko.com]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:03 PM
To: Pawel Sikorski; 'Maciej Wereski'
Cc: dev at lists.tizen.org
Subject: Re: [Dev] Tizen Common is back
On 20.11.2015 13:29, Pawel Sikorski wrote:
>>> Are the existing Tizen specific extension for the "old" crosswalk
>>> compatible with crosswalk-tizen and chromuim-efl?
> If you are referring to
> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/tizen-extensions-crosswalk, then no,
> they are not compatible.
I was asking about the repo within the Tizen Project:
I am not sure if it is identical to the repo that you pointed out but I
don't think it is important at the moment.
> New implementation of the web API modules has been created:
> https://git.tizen.org/cgit/framework/web/webapi-plugins.git/. This is the
> current version used by crosswalk-tizen.
> There are two main issues, that break the compatibility between
> tizen-extensions-crosswalk and crosswalk-tizen
> 1. While tizen platform was being updated, and platform API changed,
> tizen-extensions-crosswalk was not being aligned together with these
> Because of that, tizen-extentensions-crosswalk does not even build based
> current platform binaries.
> 2. While webapi-plugins architecture was based on
> (majority of mechanisms are used), there are still some differences
> them (eg. in case API, and, more important, the division of implementation
> between Native and JS layers).
OK, thank you for the provided details.
Will crosswalk-tizen still support remote debugging using the option
> Best Regards,
> Pawel Sikorski
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leon Anavi [mailto:leon.anavi at konsulko.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 1:19 PM
> To: Pawel Sikorski; 'Maciej Wereski'
> Cc: dev at lists.tizen.org
> Subject: Re: [Dev] Tizen Common is back
> Hi Pawel,
> On 18.11.2015 14:58, Pawel Sikorski wrote:
>> I would like to add few additional comments in the area of crosswalk and
>> We are considering Crosswalk-tizen as the crosswalk port for tizen. It is
>> based upon chromium-efl that is included in tizen image. However, the
>> coupling/dependency between the crosswalk-tizen and chromium-efl is
>> - crosswalk-tizen is based upon webview abstraction layer (ewk API)
>> by chromium-efl.
>> Thanks to such decoupling, crosswalk-tizen and web engine can be
>> changed/updated separately.
>> In opposite, "old" crosswalk was tightly coupled and deployed together
>> chromium engine, which wasn't ported for efl.
> Thank you very much for the provided valuable information.
> Are the existing Tizen specific extension for the "old" crosswalk
> compatible with crosswalk-tizen and chromuim-efl?
>> Best Regards,
>> Pawel Sikorski
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dev [mailto:dev-bounces at lists.tizen.org] On Behalf Of Maciej
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:15 PM
>> To: Leon Anavi
>> Cc: dev at lists.tizen.org
>> Subject: Re: [Dev] Tizen Common is back
>> Dnia wtorek, 17 listopada 2015 15:47:33 Leon Anavi pisze:
>>> Hi Maciej,
>>> Well done! Thank you for sharing the news :)
>>> On 17.11.2015 15:29, Maciej Wereski wrote:
>>>> Next big step is crosswalk to crosswalk-tizen
>>> Could you please provide more details about this transitions? What are
>>> the differences between Crosswalk and Crosswalk-tizen?
>> Some time ago wrt was replaced with crosswalk-tizen on TV and Mobile
>> (see TINF-1074). As I've said, we're aligning now with other profiles and
>> crosswalk isn't used on any active profiles. That's our motivation.
>> More details about differences will be provided by colleague from Web
>>> Best regards,
More information about the Dev